Cognitive Confusion On Cole In Calpundit Comments
If Bin Laden had been politically clever, he would have phrased his message in the terms of Iraqi nationalism. By siding with the narrowest sliver of Sunni extremists, he denied himself any real impact....It appears that Bin Laden is so weak now that he is forced to play to his own base, of Saudi and Salafi jihadists, some of whom are volunteer guerrillas in Iraq.
Of course, this clashes with the election-year meta-narrative that the war in Iraq has been a distraction from the war on the REAL terrorists and has in fact made them stronger. If Bin Laden has been made stronger by Bush's inept cowboy opposition, why is Cole saying he's 'so weak'?
But that's not the fun part. The real shadenfreude comes from the cognitive dissonance which results when Kevin Drum linked Cole on his blog which (unlike Cole's) accepts comments. Here's some of the high-lights:
First, Denial.
There will probably be a LOT of Sunni-on-Shia violence over the next couple of weeks in places like Pakistan after this tape. Probably some increased Shia-on-Sunni violence in Iraq.But this WON'T drive the Iraqi Shia into the U.S.'s arms, nor cause the anxious Sunnis to relax and get ready for the elections.
Posted by: Matt Davis on December 28, 2004 at 12:40 PM
Why? It's unclear, but Matt sure seems SURE about it. Have no fear, every silver lining has it's cloud! Bin Laden may be weak, but that'll cause more violence too!
Then there's slight paranoia.This is all bullshit and Juan Cole knows it. He simply wants to appear here as if he is sympathetic to the stated US goals of achieving stability in the region.Extreme paranoia!
Posted by: A on December 28, 2004 at 1:23 PM
That begs the question, is he now on the payroll like Saddam was for so long? Or was this a fake video planted by someone other than OBL?Nuanced and sophisticated reasoning!
Posted by: melior on December 28, 2004 at 2:04 PM
So, which will the Iraqi Shiites choose:Moral purist impressionistic posturing!(1) the hamfisted and clumsy foreigner George W. Bush, whose party has betrayed Shiites repeatedly in Iran and Iraq throughout the years and which repeatedly allied itself with the Sunni "extremists" and who is friends with the Saudi Royal family, the foremost practitioners of Wahhabism and who tolerates, and even preaches, the religious superiority of Christianity over Islam; or
(2) the guy who is fighting George W. Bush and the Great Satan (America for those of you unfamiliar with Shiite terminology), who is an Arab, and who is a Muslim?
Guffaw, guffaw.
Juan vive en Fantasyland.
Posted by: Advocate for God on December 28, 2004 at 3:10 PM
If my country is run by War Criminals must I hope for the success of my country in a war based on war crimes; a success that will vindicate my country's War Criminal government? Answer: A secular humanist would only choose humankind over their country, Juan Cole!Moral compasses in desperate need of repair...
Posted by: trueblue on December 28, 2004 at 1:53 PM
OBL is not the enemy of the Iraqui people;
aWol's mercenaries are. Posted by: Self-Negotiator on December 28, 2004 at 2:13 PM
And anything, but anything like a suggestion that maybe it's a good thing that Bin Laden appears weak in Iraq... and that maybe there's a reason for this, and it has to do with the US killing and capturing lots of jihadi assholes. That maybe, just maybe, Bin Laden is weak in Iraq because his thugs do not represent the political aspirations of the majority of Iraqis.
Is it unreasonable to think that maybe the commentors aren't really too happy to have Juan Cole tell them some good news about the so-called War on Terror?
Nah, couldn't be! THE TERRORISTS ARE UNSTOPPABLE!
STRUGGLING JUST MAKES IT WORSE!