Dr. Kinsey Gathers Information For A Big Report
Tongue In Cheek Mento Audio Beef Today. The Jamaican Calypsonians and Dr. Kinsey gather information on the sexual behavior of a human being.
'Dr. Kinsey' by The Jamaican Calypsonians, featuring Lord Lebby, collected on Boogu Yagga Gal
Unless you've been living under a rock, you know that there's a new movie out, dramatizing the life of Dr. Alfred Kinsey. In addition to reviving some bogus accusations of 'encouraging pedophiles,' the film has re-opened the debate which followed Kinsey's original reports 'The Sexual Behavior in the Human Male' and 'The Sexual Behavior in the Human Female.'
So here's a little contribution to the debate from everyone's favorite Carribean island, Jamaica. Originally released in 1958, 'Dr. Kinsey' is a hilarious mento tribute to the man and his reports. A jumping groove and a funny lyric, what more could you ask for?
Choice Beef Quote:He asked her lots of questions along the road
Then write down the answers in a secret code
That sends to Indiana [ something Jamaican I can't understand ]
The keeper of the average like a baseball score
(Sorry for the delay getting this entry up. As you can see below, I've been having technical difficulties.)

Comments
Chief Justice Antonin Scalia recently stated at a college commencement that he supported group orgies with strangers. No hyperbole. Don't automatically deny that Kinsey may have gotten pretty freaky-deaky.
Posted by: r.piggy | December 13, 2004 08:15 PM
I certainly don't deny that Kinsey himself got freaky deaky. I do deny the totally bogus accusations that he supported pedophiles by studying them.
If you want to see for yourself how bogus they are, feel free to check Judith Reisman's page :
http://www.drjudithreisman.org/kupdates.htm
To give you an idea which you'll see here:
"
Several articles in this series cite to the role of Dr. Alfred C. Kinsey in deceiving the world by claiming Americans are 10% to 47%, more or less, homosexual while scores of homosexual activists cite Kinsey as the man who made the homosexual movement possible. Kinsey’s homosexual percentage was seized upon by Harry Hay, the father of the homosexual “civil rights” movement, when Hay formed the Mattachine society, urging that homosexuality be seen no longer an act of sodomy but as a 10% minority class.
"
Yeah. She's a nutjob. With an axe to grind.
Welcome to The Beef!
=darwin
Posted by: Darwin | December 13, 2004 09:49 PM
Reisman is OBSESSED. I don't even wanna think about her own psychosexual hangups. Have u seen the movie?
Frankly, I hate biopics so will pass...
Posted by: jeff | December 14, 2004 02:07 PM
Nah, I haven't.. I'll probably download it though, if only to see Liam Neeson use a toothbrush as a Prince's Wand..
(I have no idea whether that particular bit of Kinsey history appears in the movie..)
=darwin
Posted by: Darwin | December 14, 2004 02:32 PM
I live under a rock :(
Posted by: cyantist | December 14, 2004 11:43 PM
Dr. Kinsey was a fucking pedophile and a queer. He interviewed one man who lead a reign of terror against children named Rex King. When he was interviewed by Kinsey he admitted to raping 800 children. And then he continued to rape but Kinsey did not give his name to the cops. Don't site the doctor-patient confidentiality thing to me, a dr. is obligated to reveal such actions as this.
Also, you think homosexuality is normal think again. I know plenty of people who went queer and back again. There has also been succesful treatments of homosexuals and they went straight. And a little bit of logic for all you atheistic, sex-crazed, mother-fucking (or father fucking, "your choice")pedophiliac assholes out there, who thinks science has all the answers. At its' height, the Greek City-State of Sparta had 10,000 soldiers. Part of the training was to develop a "relationship" with another man. You mean to tell that every single one of them was queer, I don't think so.
Also, Kinsey had sex so many times outside of his marriage and died of an STD that you can only get from man to man sexual intercourse. Take that Darwin, you fucking atheistic, pedophiliac faggot.
Posted by: Ataturk | January 4, 2005 05:31 PM
Wow darwin, your blog is getting so popular, you're attracting some grade-a nutjobs! Good work there, guy!
Posted by: kajmal | January 5, 2005 08:54 AM
Why am I a nutjob? I am merely stating fact. With exception on the homosexual part, draw your own conclusions from that
Posted by: Ataturk | January 5, 2005 01:32 PM
The thing kept on saying I didn't put in the right code, sorry about the repeats.
Posted by: Ataturk | January 5, 2005 01:36 PM
First, I have deleted your duplicate comments. No problem with the repeats, I'd rather have repeats from the Anti-Spam code than the Comment Spam which comes without it. Now, on to the topic under discussion.
You're a nutjob because you apparently can't differentiate between Kinsey, the pedophiles he studied and the author of this blog.
I get the feeling this is because of your dislike for "queers" and a hysterical phobia of un-approved sexual behavior. Certainly I am not denying that Kinsey engaged in sexual behavior which you find reprehensible. It's certainly your right to believe whatever you want about certain sexual behaviors (such as homosexual behavior), but I'm certainly not going to agree with you.
The only indication that Kinsey worked with this Rex King comes from Judith Reisman, who anyone with two brain cells to rub together can see is also a complete nutjob. Her "research" reads like the hysterical rantings of a moralistic zealot. Even if he *did* collect data from this man (and I in no way, shape or form approve of pedophilic behavior) there is a legitimate debate to be had about the role of a researcher and confidentiality of sources. There's also the legal question of whether Kinsey was legally obliged to report this sort of behavior at the time the information was obtained. I believe that this obligation exists today, but this law did not necessarily exist at the time Kinsey spoke with "Mr. X."
With regards to the "normality" of homosexuality, those homosexuals I know who have spent their entire lives being quite comfortable in their homosexuality would disagree with you. They tell me that they have always been this way, and seem quite content. If you are a Christian (as your moral sense seems to indicate) then you should listen to the words of Jesus the Christ and reserve the task of judgement for God.
Incidentally, the only biblical passages opposing homosexuality appear alongside prohibitions against shaving the side of ones face and eating shellfish. I hope if you sincerely believe that the Bible prohibits homosexual behavior that you also have peyes and never visit the Red Lobster for a shrimp cocktail.
(hopefully you can handle the appearance of the word "cock" and the word "tail" so close to each other without having a stroke..)
Even if Reisman is correct, and Kinsey should not have collected information from Mr. X, this is something entirely different from the totality of her allegations. She makes a logically suspect leap between the data collected by Kinsey from various sources and her (and your) allegation that Kinsey himself was a pedophile. Certainly you can appreciate the idea that some of the data being bad or illegally derived does not automatically make all of it illegal, or imply that the researchers participated in the illegal acts in question.
I don't find it too unlikely that Kinsey had sex outside of his marriage. I'm curious, however, as to where you got this allegation that Kinsey died of an STD that you can "only get from man to man sexual intercourse." For one thing, I was unable to find any source which indicated that Kinsey died of an STD. For another, I am not aware of any STD that only affects men, therefore the idea that he could only get this hypothetical STD from homosexual sex does not hold water for me. I'm curious as to your source for this allegation.
What makes you a real nutjob is that you responded to a post containing a HUMOROUS SONG ABOUT KINSEY with an accusation that I, the author, must be an "athiestic, pedophilliac faggot." Now, I certainly am athiestic in that I do not believe in the existence of a God who I cannot see, hear or touch. If God were to reveal himself to me, I am not so attached to my belief that I would deny his existence, so I am more properly referred to as agnostic. I am most certainly not a pedophile, nor do I approve of pedophillic behavior in any way, shape or form. As to whether I'm a "faggot" ... that's none of your fucking business. You keep your personal life to yourself and I'll do the same.
Also, learn some manners. Christ would be ashamed of you.
=darwin
PS - Here's a particularly ironic reprint of a Judith Reisman article on Kinsey's "cover-up" of pedophiles.. from a site called "Catholic Tradition." *cough*
http://www.catholictradition.org/kinsey.htm
Posted by: Darwin | January 5, 2005 03:52 PM
Maybe I did get a little self-righteous and hyped up about that, and I apologize about the name calling. By the way, I learned that little bit of info off the Michael Savage radio show. You should listen to it. It's on talk radio and 7:00-10:00PM (EST) I don't know where you live, nor do I want to, so I can't tell you the radio station.
I have also suffered from a sex addiction by the way. But now I am reformed. As to the gays, I don't know if it's a conscious or subconscious decision, but I am convinced it is based on that Spartan logic.
I call him a pedophile, not saying he raped the kids, because he didn't turn in pedophiles who hurt innocent children, not saying he did it himself, it's more like an aiding, in this case covering up of an offense which is just as bad.
By the way, I obviously can use the words cock and tail, just look at my first profanity strune blog. Once again, I am sorry for my name calling. By the way, show me your logic for being an atheist, if you please.
Posted by: Ataturk | January 5, 2005 05:51 PM
Since when is a weakened heart condition and pneumonia "an STD that you can only get from man to man sexual intercourse..." ????
Also, what is this magical STD that can only be transferred from man to man anyways? I'm sure the medical community would be very grateful to have your obviously uniquely surpassing knowledge of viruses that the rest of the world doesn't know exist imparted to them.
you sir, are an uneducated idiot.
Posted by: torn | July 15, 2005 10:33 PM